John Byer

In the Sherlockian opinion of the detective, the Christian concept of a Trinity is only a silly, hair-brained, half-wit notion. There isn’t the slightest bit of evidence to support such a bizarre premise, other than the forgery of Lucius, the Bishop of Cyrene. He is the one who fabricated the fictional Baptism story in the synoptic gospels depicting God the Father … the son Jesus … and the Holy Spirit. He also forged a multitude of  similar verses --- and randomly interspersed them throughout the New Testament. Nearly every one of these verses can be attributed to the forgery of Lucius.  In any event, there are many biblical reasons to justify why the idiosyncratic belief of three entities in one is ridiculous, and sinfully wrong theologically. In support of this assertion, no authentic, or legitimate, Bible scripture exists which supports a belief in a triune God. And, for another thing, it is manifestly contrary to the Mosaic Code (the Law that God gave Moses), and … it also contradicts other testimonial verses inside the scripture of the Bible. Accordingly, in compliance with this God-mandated law, most Jews pay homage only to the Lord. They strictly obey the First Commandment … knowing full well God has no image, as revealed in the Book of Exodus, chapter 20 verse 4. The scripture of Moses was also heeded when the Jews constructed their Temple in Jerusalem. They respectfully designed the Inner Sanctum, the most sacred place in the temple, to reflect the message of Exodus 20. In this regard, the Inner Sanctum is completely vacant, barren, and totally empty without any display of a physical image. Why? Because God said no image in heaven, on earth, or under the waters of the earth represent the Lord. Thus, Judaism does not accept the concept of a Trinity since this contrived image of God violates the Mosaic Code. Conversely, the Christian perspective on this issue is entirely different. Thus, even though Christians subscribe to the Ten Commandments, and the same God as the Jews, they routinely pray to Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, which is a visible, and very discernible   violation, of the First Commandment. Many also pray to Mary, and the various saints. However, Jesus, Mary, and the saints are human beings. None of them are God, and Jesus by his own admission, revealed he was a human being (See Revelation 1:17). Similarly, Isaiah 53:12 reports the Suffering Servant (i.e. Jesus) is a Transgressor (i.e. a sinner). God can never be accused of sinning, so according to Isaiah’s scripture, Jesus is a man, and not God. Additionally, Jesus identified himself to John on the Isle of Patmos as the “First and the Last.” He identified himself as a human being because the soul in his body was the same soul that was inside Adam … the First Man, and a sinner. This is the underlying reason why God chose Jesus to come to earth as the Messiah. It is Christ’s God-given role to bring (or lead) all souls back into the house of God, even if he has to die to do it.  Moreover, Daniel 7:13 identifies Jesus as the Son of Man (i.e. a human being) in his prophetic vision. So, the weight of evidence shows that Jesus was a human, and all these Bible verses point to one, inescapable conclusion. There is no Trinity, because Jesus was human, not God, or the son of God. And in this same vein, Jesus was not the only begotten son of God. Read Isaiah 7:14 again: Mary will have a son.  God didn’t report the child would be the Lord’s son. Sons and daughters are earthly images, not images in the celestial world. And to elaborate on this point, God infused the soul of Jesus into his physical body in the same manner which occurred 30 years later, when the Lord infused the soul of Jesus back into his mangled, bloody, lifeless, body laying inside the tomb. This point indirectly confirms the virginity of Mary since it explains how she became pregnant (i.e. just God’s will). 

Reincarnation also explains how the second coming of Jesus enabled him to regain life and arise from his grave. Nothing is beyond the capacity of God as proven by the virgin birth and then years later, the resurrection of Jesus. In summary, the death and resurrection of Jesus only makes sense if he was human. It shows the soul of Man is everlasting, and there really is life after the grave. This event fulfilled its God-given purpose since “his rebirth” refuted the false belief of the Sadducee Jews about the soul-less, nonexistent destiny of Man. In this respect, everyone already knows God can’t die, because God lives forever, so no spiritual purpose would be served by scourging and crucifying the Lord, if it was even possible... which it isn’t!  Therefore, in light of the fact Jesus is not God, but only a human being -- there is no Trinity. By definition, a flesh and blood, physical human being can never be part of a Triune God since God has no image. The Lord is invisible, a celestial entity which presents no visible image to Man. Conjunctively, there is no triune God, and as such, absolutely no basis for the idiosyncratic belief of ‘three entities in one’ ... since Jesus isn’t, and never was, the son of God. The second arm of the Trinity is absent. It is missing, and only survives as a fictional concept fabricated by the Fourth Century Bishops. 

Thus, the Trinity is only foolish, speculative, supposition, and poppycock -- surmised to be founded for the most part on the fictional, fake baptism story depicted in three synoptic gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Each of these identical stories was fabricated by the same evasive, epigrammatic disciple --- Lucius, the Bishop of Cyrene. Thus, the Trinity doesn’t exist, except in a fictitious, make-believe, fantasy world created by Lucius. It has never existed in the real world. This ancient concept is devoid of any real theological support, and it only represents the gullible thinking of credulous church Bishops who based their Trinitarian belief on the contrived scripture inside the New Testament.  It is perceived the whole idea of a “Trinity” materialized after the Bishops read the fictional Baptism story created by Lucius. Why? Because it is the only place where God the Father, the Holy Spirit, and the Son are all mentioned at the same time in an event which is presumed to be true, i.e. the Baptism of Jesus. Even the gospel of the Apostle John tends to support the presence of a Spirit when ‘John the Baptist’ mentions he “beheld the Spirit descending as a dove” that abode upon Jesus.

(Note: The detective discerns Lucius corrupted John’s depiction of the Baptism. The Reason:  Verses 1:29-33 in John’s gospel report this … John the Baptist didn’t know Jesus. Except, he was the cousin of Jesus; probably an Essene like Jesus; and, his role was to prepare the way for Jesus. Thus, John was well acquainted with Jesus contrary to these verses. Thus, the conclusion: Lucius corrupted John’s gospel.)  

Compounding these scriptural issues, John the Baptist (the only witness at the Baptism of Jesus), does not report hearing the voice of God the Father. Moreover, he doesn’t report hearing the voice of anyone else, and he really didn’t see the Spirit, but only perceived its presence. In describing Christ’s baptism, John claims he “beheld the Spirit descending as a dove” from the sky, and as he watched, it took abode upon Jesus. John may have sensed a spirit was around, or over Jesus, but how could he see it, when it is invisible to man? If he had really seen the spirit, then he would have described it, but he couldn’t describe something which is invisible to the human eye, so he used a dove to analogously describe the Spirit. Much later, Lucius took John’s story and fabricated his untrue, made-up, mythical version of the Baptism event for the three synoptic gospels. These three gospel stories are only the fiction of Lucius, but unfortunately, the Bishops of the early church were completely hornswoggled, and deceived by the fake baptism story.  As a consequence, the detective perceives they developed the concept of a Trinity in their fervid attempt to rationally explain the irrational, or said another way, the relationship of the three entities identified in the fake Baptism story of Lucius, two of which would have been invisible. They didn’t realize the fabled Baptism, and all the other references to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost (Spirit) in the New Testament, had also been forged by Lucius. In this regard, the Bishops should have been more diligent and focused. If they read just a little further into John’s gospel, they would know Jesus reported God has no voice or image (John 5:37), which may have revealed to them … they were only reading the fiction of Lucius.  Additionally, if God has no image, like Jesus reported, then a Trinity can’t exist, since a Trinity, by definition, is an image … albeit fake image -- of a godhood depicting three-entities.

Then after two Church Councils in 325 and 381 CE, the concept of a Trinity was inscribed into the Nicene Creed. Thus, ever since the fourth century, the following beliefs have been Christian dogma:

 We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God … begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father ... And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spake by the prophets ... (Creeds of Christendom, Volume 1, 24-29)

 Except, God isn’t the “Father Almighty.”  The Lord is definitely Almighty, but God doesn’t identify as a “Father” since no earthly image of God exists (Exodus 20:4). This false assignment of anthropomorphic features to God is something the Lord does not appreciate. It is a belittlement of God’s true identity of which Man has no conception; and the Lord Jesus Christ … is a false identification of Jesus. He is not the Lord … God is the Lord. Jesus was a human being as pointed-out above. Isaiah, Daniel, and Jesus all agree, concur, and confirm his human identity. Jesus identified himself only as the son of Man (i.e. a human being), but Lucius converted most of these verbal phrases originally found in scripture of the Apostles to the son of God.  Since Lucius was the Keeper of Records for the early church, he was the sole, living person capable of    corrupting the various scriptures. Jesus identified himself as a human, never as God or the Lord. His purpose as a human was to prove to the Jews via his Resurrection, they (as humans) have an everlasting living soul that existed even after the grave. 

And, the Lord Jesus Christ is NOT the only-begotten son of God. The Lord God said Man (both male and female) are made in God’s image, and that spiritual image does not reflect a male or female body. Remember: God has no physical image and neither do the souls of Man since they are made in the image of God. God is spiritual energy and so are the souls of all mankind. Thus Jesus is not the only begotten son of God;   this physical attribution has misidentified Jesus for a very, very long time. If a person studiously reads Isaiah 7:14, the verse reports God will give a sign, and “a virgin will bear a son;” it doesn’t proclaim a son will be born to the Lord God, because the soul of Jesus has existed since eternity (as all human souls have), and thus, Christ’s soul was not being born either in a spiritual or a physical sense. It was only being moved, transferred, or relocated to earth. This is a difficult nut for people to crack, because most humans cannot think outside the box of their own physical world. The spiritual realm of God is beyond man’s imagination since man resides in a three-dimensional sphere. However, the soul of Christ (or the person we know as Jesus) was sent, i.e. dispatched to Earth by God (and it had no gender identity). This soul then entered, and occupied, the male physical body of Jesus that God created for him on earth. It is perceived this incarnation probably occurred on Yom Kippur (5BCE), but the soul of Jesus was not born, since it had existed for eternity prior to taking up residence on earth. Christ is not the only son of God since all souls in this vast world entering male bodies (or female bodies) enter into the flesh the same way. Thus, if all souls enter human bodies in the same manner, then Jesus can’t be the only begotten son of God. This expression is a misnomer, since the existing, living soul of Christ was moved, and relocated to earth, not spiritually born or physically born (See John: 6: 38 - 40 as one of many times where Jesus says he was sent to earth). Therefore, he was not begotten (in a sexual or reproductive sense), nor was he the son of God from a spiritual perspective … because his soul has no masculine image … it is LIGHT or spiritual energy. Also, Christ’s incarnation into a male body was not an accident. His physical body represents the original sin he committed in the Garden of Eden. This is the reason Jesus identified himself as “the first and the last” to John on the Isle of Patmos (Revelation 1: 17-18). John understood the destiny of Christ’s soul, so he knew the soul in Christ was the same soul that was in Adam. Jesus also knew John would recognize him in his celestial state by those identifying words.

And the Holy Ghost, the third arm of the Trinity does not exist … Why? Because the   message of God to Moses on Mt. Sinai (Exodus 20:4) contradicts this belief. Thus, if there is no image of God, then it is impossible for the Trinity to exist. And, since there is no triune God, the ‘Holy Spirit’ is a fictional entity. This Holy Spirit and God are one and the same. The singular reason for a belief in a Holy Spirit originates with Lucius, and undoubtedly, his fictional story about the Baptism of Jesus. After he wrote this story, he then inserted multiple verses in the Bible’s scripture about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And, because Lucius injected these entities into various gospels and the epistles which he wrote (not the Apostles or Paul), people have been fooled about the reality of the Holy Spirit. The sign of the cross by Catholics has also perpetuated a false belief in a Holy Spirit as an individual, distinct being -- separate from two other entities within a triune God. In any event, if there was a separate “spiritual” entity at the Baptism of Jesus, then it could have been an angel (such as Gabriel or Michael). 

As the book Lucianity explains, Lucius, the Bishop of Cyrene, never understood the reason Jesus incarnated on earth. As such, his ignorance and all his false beliefs are embedded into the verses of the New Testament. He was able to corrupt the epistles and gospels of every disciple because he possessed all their documents --- as the Keeper of Records. The church Bishops in the Fourth Century never realized this fact about Lucius when they drafted the Nicene Creed. As a result, they created a Creed which does not correctly reflect history … or true Christian belief. The Creed contains multiple misstatements about Christianity, and one of those misstatements relates to the Trinity or the governance of Man by an oligarchical spiritual entity. The Bishops tried to rationalize the events, and beliefs, they found in the New Testament, but in the end, they only compounded the falsity of Lucius.  

Exit and Return to Page listing all Articles on this website.